….A Bit Unproductive

So….

This week I didn’t accomplish as many things as I had hoped. Largely, this was due to a sudden increase in my workload at my job.

computer throw

Work this week~

Sigh. Life happens. It’s no excuse but I just wanted to explain upfront why this week’s post may be lacking some its usual zeal~

Anyway, back to our regularly scheduled program!

The Lowdown

So, this week, I spent a lot of time thinking about the design of my piece. I’m rather concerned about creating the work. Though I appreciate a lot of the sources Jason Nelson shared with me, they still come across as very daunting at first. Maybe I need to spend more time perusing them? This week, I was unfortunately unable to do more than skim the coding site Dr. Nelson shared with me. I’m interested in coding but I’m also interested in exploring maybe other avenues of creating a work with the kind of functionality I want. On Twitter, Stevan Živadinovic mentioned checking out Twine to see if I could make a prototype of what I’m looking for. I have some experience with Twine so I may want to experiment more with its functionality. Zivadinovic also mentioned that I might just have to “bite the bullet” and dive into Unity. As Dr. Nelson also recommended Unity, I’m thinking I may have to really bite that bullet.

That said, I’ve reached out to some of my friends in the digital arts about what programs they recommend. I want to incorporate some of my own drawings and, maybe, even metalworks into this project. I’m waiting to hear back from these friends about what they recommend. Honestly, I want to see how much I can make in a program like Photoshop or Krita or, for audio, Protools or Audacity, before I have to delve into other sources.

As for the structure of the work I want to create, I’ve had some thoughts. This week, in another course, I looked into Juliet Davis’ Pieces of Herself. It’s a very powerful and compelling work of Elit that impacted me greatly. Both the work’s design and content really struck me. I love the superimposition of elements in the piece and how that technique can be used to convey meaningful messages. It inspired me to think more deeply about the design components of my own work as well as the kind of message I want to convey about self-representation and aesthetic presentation in our current digital age.

While I like my initial concept of the shattered mirror, I wonder if it might be more apt for my work to be centered around a silhouette of a face, neck, and shoulders with a collage/photo-montage of different elements slathered across its face. Each of these elements would be clickable and would take the user to another screen. Some of the elements may be tweets or memes or a Dada manifesto or a snippet of poetry. Maybe, I want to make this work ore about the self-representation aspect? I was very moved by Davis’ work and I find myself very moved by works that revolve around the construction, negotiation, and navigation of identity and self. I find art to be an offshoot of self-presentation, so maybe that’s how that subject would tie into the work. Maybe I could have a screen of silhouettes, formatted like a rogues gallery or a board of wanted posters or something too??? I really think I want to delve into how involved digital content has become in the construction of the self. But, I don’t necessarily want to convey that that’s a bad thing. It’s just a change, a difference.

I love all of the research I’ve done so far into Dadaism and into new ways of identity construction through digital media but, maybe, I should make this work more personal? Perhaps use a silhouette of my face and mix in digital content with other creative works. Kind of use an individual example of the evolution of navigating the self to apply to a larger whole, to make a larger statement. Maybe I should focus on just conveying the ambivalence of navigating and negotiating self-representation??? I don’t know.

As you can see, I’ve had a hell of a week caught up in my thoughts. I could definitely use some guidance and, really, someone to bound ideas off of. Hopefully, this week, I can get a more solid grasp of what I want to create and begin researching ways to create it.

****

~Till next week~

hannibalwinkingsexilygif

Advertisements

Hammering Out the Details~

So….. before we get down to the nitty gritty, I want to announce an update to last week’s post:

JASON NELSON GOT BACK TO ME!!!!

skwisgar yeah

I received a response to my inquiry I sent last week to Dr. Nelson wherein I asked him about his design and artistic processes. Also, I asked if he had any recommendations for how someone who doesn’t have a background in graphics or digital art (like me) could go about creating a work of Elit.

Side note: He was very excited that I wanted to get into Elit. Like, there were exclamation points and everything going on!!!! Heck yeah!!!

Anyway, Dr. Nelson provided me with an abundance of information about his creative process and how he approaches a new project. Also, he went into more detail about the differences between designing a work for the screen and designing an installation work. Largely, most of the difference revolves around audience and reach. Designing a work for an online space affords more access as it allows for a larger audience to interact with the work. An Elit piece for the screen can reach a global audience very quickly. Creating an installation work, though, can allow for a more intimate experience between the participant and the content. Not that an online work cannot be intimate–far from it. But, the intimacy is different. The experience is different. Neither one is better or worse. Neither experience should be diminished in comparison to the other. It’s just important to be aware of the differences in affordances each provides.

So, the kind of Elit work I want to create may be depend on the audience I am hoping to reach.

The question of audience is a difficult one in many ways. Because I want to explore self-representation and navigation self-representation in digital spaces, I think an Elit work that allows for more personal, one-on-one interaction would be most demonstrative of my points. But, because I believe aesthetic presentation intersects with this topic and provides interesting dimension to it, a work that presents itself almost as a kind of art exhibition/installation may be more illustrative of that aspect.

In many ways, I think I want to create a work that can be experienced through multiple modes. Like, it can be experienced on a screen or it can be experienced as an installation. I’m not yet sure how to make a work like that. More discussion with other artists and content creators may be necessary. I like the idea of creating a work that has additional components to it, though, based upon whether it is accessed via screen or installation.

In regards to creating this work, Dr. Nelson also provided me with some coding resources. There are many sites one can access in order to teach themselves how to code. Dr. Nelson shared this site with me in particular. Though not necessary, Dr. Nelson expressed that learning how to code can provide a digital artist with more creative freedom over their work and can provide more space to explore.

Also recommended to me were some game making programs such as Gamesalad, Construct2, Gamemaker, and, the hardest of the bunch, Unity. All of these are kinds of visual programming software. These programs can be used to make games or be used to create creatures with more interactive functionality. The first 3 programs cost money, though, and Unity, though free, can be challenging to learn how to use. I believe I have to explore some of these programs before I can really discuss more about their affordances. Dr. Nelson recommended I research some YouTube tutorials on the programs. For many of these programs, luckily, there exists an abundance of online tutorials. This is reassuring and makes tackling any one of these programs seem a little less intimidating/ daunting.

All in all, Dr. Nelson gave me a lot of good advice about how to approach a digital project as well as provided me with a lot of resources (I did not know about before) to consider. I Again, though, I think I need to do more tinkering with these programs to decide which one would work best for my project. I look forward to continuing my correspondence with Dr. Nelson and learning whatever he has to teach me about Elit and about creating digital art and content.

Designing the Degenerates Gallery

This week, I continued to work on my concept and design for my Degenerates Gallery. As mentioned before, I want my work to invite readers to explore the mutability and trans formative nature of self-representation and aesthetic presentation in the digital age. In many ways, I want this work to be art. To be poetry. I don’t want it to be a lesson. I don’t want it to be a warning. I think self-representation and aesthetic presentation have definitely changed with the onset of online intervention. In many ways, both have become more complicated to navigate. But, I don’t think either have been diminished. Again, I believe there is meaning in exploring differences as differences rather than as diminshments.

Anyway, as discussed in my last post, I imagine this work to be one that is entered through a kind of shattered mirror/screen. I would like for selfies or other portrait-type pictures to flash across the mirror/screen. In between flashes of faces, I imagine a kind of television static or “glitch” type of graphic (if possible). Here is the mirror I drew (it’s from an old drawing):

Mirror Screen Edit

I put a filter on it to cool down the tone of the drawing. This mirror has some personal significance to me as it is the mirror I use to put on my face every morning. I like that added level of complexity, though I’m not sure if it will come into play at any point in the actual work.

In order to “shatter” this mirror/screen, so to speak, I used my laptop to just drawn some jagged lines across the picture. I imagine each piece of the mirror will be more separated and, possibly, the piece will be floating across the space of the screen. I’m not sure yet if I want to do that or if it would be just as meaning to have the mirror shattered but still holding its shape as pictured below:

Mirror Screen Edit_LI

This came out better than expected, tbh~

Again, across the mirror/screen, I would like to have selfies or self-portraits flashing. I think I need more advanced tools, even just basic Photoshop, to illustrate my vision but I did try to create a sample of what I am envisioning (don’t laugh):

Layered Mirror and Face

It’s just a sample of what I’m hoping to create. I want to fit the selfies more to the size of the mirror/screen. Also, I think it might be worthwhile to put the selfies through a kind of filtering program like Lunapic Pixelate Effect or the ACSII Art camera. (Both are sources I was introduced to through @cogdog Prof Alan Levine’s Daily Digital Alchemy exercises ^.^ Thanks Alan!) Putting the pictures through a filter beforehand may eliminate the need to code some kind of glitch/static affect. It’s something to consider, at least.

I really like Stevan Živadinovic’s approach to incorporating art into an Elit piece as well. For Hobo Lobo of Hamelin, he drew out the images and characters on paper before editing them online and incorporating them into the work. With my background in studio art, I think an approach like this might work best for me. Again, I think I need to invest in an image-editing program like Photoshop, in order to make this work. The end result might be really compelling.

As for how this work would operate/how users would navigate it, I want each shard of the shattered mirror/screen to take readers to another window. Each window should illustrate some different facet of self-representation or aesthetic presentation in the digital age. I imagine one shard would lead to an archive of reference sources–such as links to other artists or their work, links to memes or meme formats, links to tweets, links to manifestos, etc. This part of the work I imagine to operate somewhat like the archive section from Illya Szilak’s Reconstructing Mayakovsky. Another shard, I imagine to take users to an infinitely black screen. Once the screen has loaded, the screaming will start. This is meant to be a play off the popular internet meme/slang of “screaming into the void”. In many ways, this meme would operate in my work as a form of contemporary performative Dadaism. This part of my work is inspired heavily by Hugo Ball and the shows he would put on. He was all about sound poetry and decontextualizing sound.

Another shard, I want to lead readers to a screen that will display a kind of infinite stream of text, similar to Taroko Gorge and its many remixes. I want the text to be a mixture of Dada manifestos and tweets from popular, nonsensical/nihilistic accounts like @dril.

tumblr_inline_nyx6kv49bi1tshs8w_1280

I mean, this is Dada gold

I still need to think about where some of the other shards should go. I want there to be an interactive component to this work. I’m just not sure what it would be. Somehow, I want readers to be able to construct a representation of themselves from the work. I’m not sure how best to go about that yet.

Also, I want to incorporate my own voice into this piece. I want the language of the work to be poetic and, perhaps, a bit sardonic or parodic (like Jason Nelson’s voice in works like This is how you will die and Game, game, game, and again game.)

Ultimately, I hope to make this work one that reveals how seemingly nonsensical forms of self-expression are still meaningful if for no other reason than they create who you are. They tell a story of how you navigate the self and the world. More, I think this trend towards absurdity and nihilism in contemporary representations of the self reveal something deeper about the human condition, about how we are currently coping with the state of our societies and culture. Particularly in the western world, I think these trends reveal some deep truths about how we are not coping–with anything. In a world that is so deeply flawed, how can our expressions of self not be? How can we not all be rogues? Not all be degenerates?

Though I definitely still have a lot of work ahead of me, I think the work I’ve done thus far has provided me with some good direction. I feel more grounded in my ideas. Dr. Nelson’s support, too, also gives me some confidence. Creating this work feels a little less daunting with support.

****

~Till next time~

hannibalwinkingsexilygif

Degenerates Gallery~

Disclaimer

So….. this week I was tasked with reaching out to some digital content creators that inspired me. Through discussion with them, I hoped to glean more about their creative process as well as get some guidance on how to approach a larger digital project. Being that I only have a background in studio art, this advice would be helpful in providing me with some direction for broaching not just my own project, but the concept behind it.

At the time of writing this post, I have yet to hear back from those I emailed. (Fingers crossed, though~)

Regardless, I have spent this week thinking more deeply about the kind of project I would like to make for my thesis. Specifically, I’ve been reflecting on the work and projects I’ve made thus far as well as on the projects I want to work on. This reflection led me to create 2 lists: A list of 8 things I’ve made that I love and a list of 4 things I would like to make.

8 Things I’ve Made That I Love

  1. Sweet Screams…. I made this nightmare catcher about a year ago. I was heavily inspired by some bones I received from a friend. It got me thinking about how to display them. Also, I had been wanting to work on a larger metals project for a while. I made this work during a time of great inspiration. I remember feeling the power of my own concept as I worked on this piece. I love the idea of corrupting faerie tales/faerie tale objects. There’s something about challenging traditionalism that really motivates me.
  2. Bone Girl… I wrote this story a little over a year ago as well. It was inspired by a random twitter bot prompt but really became something unique unto itself. I have created several other works that are heavily influenced by this piece. I’ve also narrated the story myself (with sound effects) as well as created a slide-show display of sorts for the piece (complete with images). It’s a dark twist of a tale, about a mother and daughter and the rituals they share.
  3. Ungentle Into the Night is a story that started off as another story inspired by a bot prompt on my blog titled Living Dead GirlIt became a series consisting of 4 installments (II, III, IV). I continued writing the story for a class on writing fiction for young adults and it became a 30 page work. It’s a story about a necromancer, Thana, and a reaper, Hayden, working together to set an underworld out of whack back into whack. It was the first longer, creative work I had written in a long time. I hope to finish writing it one day.
  4.  Iscariagor… Is a piece of piece of jewelry I made about a year ago as well. It’s a necklace that I cut out, shaped, and enameled to look like blood splatter. I came up with the name for the piece by combining the words Iscariot, ichor, and gore. I envisioned this necklace was commissioned by a queen who demanded a piece of jewelry be made from the blood of traitors. Charming, yeah?
  5. Supply… This is the title of a collection of poetry I wrote last semester. It was inspired by a relationship with someone I really loved and who I really miss now. I wanted to immortalize us and the loved we shared, however short, in the most meaningful way I could: through writing. It’s some of the most personal writing I’ve done in a long time. Here’s one of the poems from the collection I really love:
  6. Two-Faced…. img_6491img_6492Inspired by my poetry collection, Supply, I also made a work in metals. This piece is made from two pieces of acrylic, one black and one red, both cut in the shape of my head in profile. On each is a poem I chased into a piece of metal and then cut out and riveted on to it corresponding acrylic piece. On the black and blue side is a more sad poem while on the bright red and orange side is a passionate poem.
  7. Recently, my mom and I have been attending free arts & crafts classes at our public library. In those classes, we have had a chance to do pysanky (Ukrainian egg decorating) and rock painting. I’m really happy with both works I made in these workshops.
  8. Silence Screams Weren’t Always…. This is the Elit piece I made a few years back in my first ever class about Eliterature. I made the work in PowerPoint and I was very proud of the final product. It was meant to be this immersive experience that allowed readers to explore the often decontextualized and cyclical nature of trauma. I wish I could share it with you but it, unfortunately, only exists as a download.

Honorable Mentions

  • Nox Siog… This is the first bot I ever made! It tweets out little disturbing/poetic messages throughout the day. I love how the aesthetic and text of this bot work together. I wonder if it’s inspired anybody else to write….
  • Moonie Girl…. More like Mooning Girl This is the first bot I made using the Markov text generator option on Dr. Zach Whalen’s spreadsheet that I use to create my bots. This bot tweets out messages pieced together from my poetry collection, Supply.

4 Things I Want To Make

  1. Banshee Wind Chime…. A wind chime made from rib bones, silent until it announces your death only to your ears~
  2. You should see me in a crown…. This is a crown/headdress/kokoshnik largely inspired by the song You should see me in a crown by Billie Eilish as well as by my own desire to be a queen. Since you decided not to treat me like a princess, I decided to make myself a queen. I’m currently working on making it a reality in metals this semester~
  3. Treachery… This is an old story I wrote a while back about a dark faerie world. I want to edit it and continue working on it. I want this to be a series of work eventually, consisting of many different tales of the lives of many different characters that got me through some of the toughest times of my life~
  4. Degenerates Gallery…. This is the digital work I would like to try and make for my thesis. It is inspired by the Degenerate Art exhibition held by the Nazis during the war to disparage and diminish Dada art as well as by the idea of the Rogues Gallery. Essentially, it would be a work that would allow readers to explore the nature of self-representation in online spaces as well as explore the influence of Dada ideology on contemporary forms of aesthetic and self-representation. I imagine the work to be a kind of Elit piece.

Imagining the Gallery

In my head, I imagine the first sight users would see when they enter the Degenerates Gallery is a shattered mirror-like screen. (I kind of imagine the word WANTED flashing in the black background as well????) Shards would be littered across the screen but still spaced close enough apart that the user could see the shape of the mirror that once as. Across the shards, faces would flash in and out. Different faces (I hope I can gather from asking for volunteers on social media sites). In between these faces, there would be static, making the mirror both a mirror and a screen.

Clicking on a shard would take the user to a different page. Each page would allow the reader to explore some different facet of how we construct ourselves in online spaces/of how Dada has reemerged and how a Dada lens can help us navigate these new kinds of self-representation. I imagine one shard would take users to an archive of sorts, kind of like the one in Illya Szilack’s Reconstructing Mayakovsky. This archive would provide users with a collection of reference points which may assist them in further navigating the work. I would like another shard to take users to a dark screen, where a twitter post, maybe, about “screaming into the void” pops up before fading into black as a loud scream begins to sound. This would be a kind of reference to Hugo Ball’s… interesting approach to Dada performance art. (You can see why an archive of sorts may be necessary.)

I’d like to open the work up to submissions, as well. I imagine putting up flyers around campus and tweeting out about how I am “Now Accepting Submissions to the Degenerate Art 2.0 Exhibition!” I think it might be fun to contrast submissions to famous works of Dada art. This would be another shard.

Essentially, I want an exploration of each shard to eventually reveal a new whole. I want the seeming brokenness to yield to a new, compelling whole.

Again, I’m no one with a background in creating digital art. So, I’m not sure how much of what I’ve just described is possible. But, I think even creating something close to what I’ve described would allow for an enriching experience and exploration of how we navigate and understand ourselves and how we create and express ourselves in online spaces.

I hope I’ll hear back from some of the artists I wrote soon! So, I can move this piece off of the the want to list to the made list!

****

~Till next time~

hannibalwinkingsexilygif

Getting Artsy????

Dilemmas

Am I an artist?

To be honest, this was the question of the week for me. Ever since I wrote down in my notes last class, “As an artist, what do I want to create?” I’ve been struggling. Mainly with that first artist part. It’s a strong word. Kind of heavy. Like a promise–a promise that I’m doing things and not just any things but insightful things, meaningful things.

I am artiste

art is my passion

…kind of like that.

Anyway, that question has been at the back of my mind all week as I try to figure out exactly what I want to work on for my thesis project. Not just what to make, but what makes an artist?

Before I dive too deep into that downward spiral, I do want to share what I discovered in regards to bot-making! In last week’s meeting, I was very interested in the possibility of creating an installation that revolved around an interface between bots, responding to each other and beyond. Primarily, I was interested in figuring out a way to get the bots to respond to Dada-related material posted to Twitter. For instance, if an edgelord someone posted a tweet about “wanting to die lmao”, I could have @Ya_Boi_DuCHAMP respond with “same” followed by some lines from an interview on Dada or lines from a Dada manifesto.  Maybe I’d have an account @totally_NOT_Ya_Boi_DuCHAMP tweet out pics of urinals~

Essentially the stream–ha ha–would be its own kind of collaborative, netprov/ performance anti-art.

At least, that was an idea I had. After reaching out to some excellent bot-creators and professionals in the fields of digital studies and culture, Dr. Leonardo Flores (@Leonardo_UPRM) & Dr. Zach Whalen (@zachwhalen), I’m not sure if it’s still the direction I want to go in due to some limitations imposed on the medium. Recent regulation crackdowns with Twitter’s policies have made it rather difficult to create bots that would have the exact kind of functionality I’m looking for.

Both Dr. Flores and Dr. Whalen did recommend I check out Cheap Bots Done Quick. According to them, I can create bots through this site that would allow them to interact with and respond to other users. There isn’t a reply option, though (which I’m not sure I’d need). Also, the site relies on Tracery to select for the kinds of “tags” I’m looking for. So, I’d have to experiment with that to see what kind of functionality I’d have there.

Dr. Whalen also presented another option–Glitch. Bots created through this platform can be as “nuanced as I program them to be” but there’s a catch–I need to supply my own App credentials and Twitter is no longer giving those out. So, I’d have to re-purpose old bot credentials or have none.

So….I have options???

Options

But, I really need to explore these different suggestions more thoroughly and see if either could be viable. I’m hoping to be able to that as part of my research for next week!

Back to that Question…

Now, as for whether or not I still think I want to make a bot installation, that’s indeterminable at this time.

headdesk

Sorry.

I’m just not sure yet if a bot installation would be the best way to present the research I want to do.

As mentioned in my previous post, I’m interested in a possible connection between new digital forms of media and a kind of Neo-Dadaism/resurgence of Dada idealism. I find the possibility of that, and its implications, to be exciting. (It doesn’t hurt that it combines two of my fave subject areas either–art history and the digital humanities.)

But, after last week’s discussion, I think my purview of interest spreads further than that. Especially after looking at work by digital artists such as Maria Mencia and Emilio Vavarella–who reached out to me on Twitter to thank me for my interest in his work and to encourage me to continue my own!!!!!— I think I need to adjust the scope of my own research.

I’m not just interested in bits and blips of representation here and there across the digital data-sphere. No, I’m interested in self-representation in the digital age on a larger scale. I’m interested in how seemingly disparate forms of expression can combine to create new wholes. I’m interested in what that new whole is and in what it represents about you, me, and us.

Who are the creators behind emerging or re-emerging forms of expressions online?

Who are the artists?

I find this subject matter to be very compelling. Identity is such an integral yet experimental constant of life. Especially now, though, it has become challenged and re-imagined and remixed in new ways. I think it would be interesting to explore how identity is navigated and self-represented in the rich and ever-evolving digital landscape that is shaping more and more of our society and culture everyday.

A digital work that also inspired me to think more deeply about self-representation, identity, and technology this week is Reconstructing Mayakovsky by Illya Szilak. It is a work of Elit that I researched (and wrote about here) for another class. I don’t want to delve too deeply into my own thoughts on the work’s conceptual underpinnings but I do want to speak a little about its interface.

Essentially, there is a main narrative aspect of the work but there is also all of this rich historical, textual, and aesthetic content that, when paired with the narrative aspect, creates this whole new world for exploring literature, art, and ideology of the past. That I find interesting in the context of my own conceptual interests. I think it might be worth exploring how I could construct a work of ELit like Reconstructing Mayakovsky that would allow explorers of it to engage with and experience Neo-Dada and the complex relationship of the self and art to the digital in a new and compelling way. Could be artistic, yeah? Sounds artsy-ish, at least. Artist-material??? Call me Duchamp Idk.

And, that’s where I am now.

***Edit: ORSP got back to me and told me, essentially, I could have an installation work as part of Research Days. I would need to supply more information about the actual parameters of the installation before I could get approval or discuss exactly what to expect in terms of space and whatnot. They seemed game to help me, though–which is good!

****

~Till next time~

hannibalwinkingsexilygif

Finding My Jam~

“we can’t all be poets but we have literary value…” ~ Alex Saum, The Democratic Value of Art Making from Fake Art Histories & The Inscription of the Digital Self

Welcome to my thesis blog~ Don’t mind the nonsense or the anxiety–it’s part of the process ^.^

My Jam 

So, my jam is searching for traces neo-neo-Dadaism is new digital media. For the folks at home, that means I’m looking for traces of an older art movement’s ideals–like absurdism, nihilism, anarchism, amoralism, automatism, de-contextualization–in new, emergent forms of digital creation like memes, and gifs, and Elit–Eliterature–not ebooks (check it). Specifically, I’m interested in making connections between new digital media and art so as to, maybe, better understand the implications and the purposes behind some of these emergent forms. Art and what it represents is a way to understand deeper and more profound truths about ourselves and our society. Ultimately, I hope my work can be applied to our understanding of emerging, digital genres and the users behind them as well as expanded by others to help contextualize future, digital works.

While my research and findings on this subject could certainly be represented through traditional means of presenting theses, it is my desire, as not just a researcher but an artist too, to incorporate some kind of installation or exhibit to accompany my work. In order to get a better grasp of some of the avenues I could take to accomplish this feat, I researched some contemporary digital artists and elit-authors/creators and their projects and wow. There is a lot of cool stuff going on in the field! Experimental and kind of confusing but, oh so inspiring and insightful and creative. I’m so excited to share some of the exciting work going on out there in the digital humanities and arts fields ^.^ I hope you find some of their work exciting too!

Poetic License

Maybe it’s my background in and my lifelong love (so far) for poetry, but I found myself heavily drawn towards some of the more poetic works of digital art and creation. More, I think I just love the idea of incorporating text–something so traditional–with the digital. SO many projects right now are dealing with de-contextualization, as well, and a new kind of digital automatism–which are both fascinating concepts in the analog sense but are given new life by new technology.

Alex Saum‘s #SelfiePoetry project is one such work that sticks out. The series, composed of two volumes–Fake Art Histories & The Inscription of the Digital Self, explore, “the intertwining of two ideas: the untruth behind artistic or literary histories, and our (il) legitimacy to intervene them to create narratives that make teleological [def. relating to or involving the explanation of phenomena in terms of the purpose they serve] sense”. The collection consists of 8 poems that challenge the notion of “the self” against “a somewhat vague, and rather unorthodox, selection of literary movements in Spanish and English”. Essentially, the human is contrasted against the literary, truth notwithstanding.

The poems exists as videos in which Alex Saum recites her poetry over a collage of selfies and other compelling/contrasting images. The first volume exists as a playlist here.

This is my fave from the collection:

I think this poem, in particular, embodies the aesthetic and the tone I am looking to embody in my own work.

Another digital poet who’s work captures that aesthetic and tone I appreciate is Ian Hatcher. I was a little hesitant when I first looked him up since it seemed like audio and sound were his jam (fyi for new readers, sound and audio are not my jam; in fact, they intimidate me quite a lot). Still, I decided to look into his work (due to a stellar recommendation) and I am so glad I did. His poetic style and voice are absolutely captivating and compelling.

Here’s one of my fave works:

It is so cool and I can imagine an audio file like this accompanying an installation work. Hatcher’s poetry reminds me of, again, the de-contexualized valued my many Dada (and Futurist, tbh) artists and writers.

In addition to Hatcher’s audio works, I also found his poetry app , Abra, to be quite interesting.

It seems to be another study in de-contextualization but also in absurdism and trying to make meaning from seeming nonsense. If not an installation proper, I think creating an app of some sort to accompany my thesis work may also be an idea worth exploring. An app would put my work in the hands of and before the eyes of a wide ranging audience, perhaps enhancing the impact of my work. The affordances of an app also bring into question the exact nature of the message I want to promote. What is the role of the viewer in interacting with new forms of digital media? And, how can I make neo-Dadaism in new digital media mean something to my audience?

*Highly recommend you check out the app and play around with it for yourself!

Jason Nelson is another elit artist and poet I admire and whose work truly inspires me to think about the possibilities of my own work. In fact, I would say Nelson’s This is how you will die inspired this thesis! It first made me aware of the possibility of there being Dadaism in new forms of digital creation.

While searching through his website, I came across a poetic work of Elit titled Evidence of Everything ExplodingI didn’t read/play through the whole piece but its initial set-up and aesthetic appeals to me.

Evidence of Everything Exploding

I also like the idea of combining poetry with an underlying, possibly historical, plot. Elit certainly allows for such seemingly dichotomies to exist and be meaningful. It might be fun to explore incorporating some poetry, perhaps from myself or classic Dada artists, over classic memes or gifs or something?? Perhaps with audio of me reading another poem over-top?? That might be over-the-top but it could be compelling.

I see Nelson’s work being seminal to my own research; I just keep coming back to it and finding something new in it every time to appreciate and engage with, emotionally and intellectually. The way Nelson articulates absurdity and nonsense but also deep meaning is both impressive and inspiring (sorry if I’m fangirling but god non-denominational do I love his work).

Re-conceptualizing the Self

Another theme I found myself drawn towards in my research of digital artists was that of the self and of self-representation in the digital age. What does it mean to be yourself in the digital world? What does it matter?

Emilio Vavarella‘s Digital Skin Series is one of the first digital art projects that really drew me in when I began my research. I was absolutely, morbidly fascinated by the project and a little bit disturbed? It’s great. I mean, look at it:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

It’s so f*cking cool

On Vavarella’s website, he says of this project:

The Digital Skin Series is composed of self-portraits in which I pose “under the digital skin” of strangers I’ve crossed paths with in the past. To create this series, I first used a 3D scanner to obtain an accurate tridimensional model of my face. Then I used a camera-prototype to acquire HD portraits of strangers. Finally, I applied their portraits to my digital skull as if they were simply an additional layer. The result is a series of photographs where bidimensionality and tridimensionality collide in an intimate and unpredictable way.

In the past, myths about skin were common across cultures and related to radical biological metamorphoses. For example, in the Navajo tradition – which considered the skin a mask – if you were to lock your eyes with those of the skinwalkers, they could project themselves into your body and transform into you. In today’s network society, bodies have left that organic condition and are characterized by transient statuses: individuals have become di-viduals, data aggregates, samples, signals. The last boundary between us and the world, our skin, has become a transient membrane that changes along with the trans- and meta- human forms under it. The space that was occupied by the skinwalkers of the past has been taken over by infinite reconfigurations and mediations. What remains the same is that to be human still means to constantly shift through generative metamorphosis, corruptions, and de-generations that escape any clear categorization.

It’s such a fascinating idea and I think it’s realization conveys its conceptual underpinning very well. Also, I like the introduction an remixing of the mythological in this project. I think that background adds a whole other layer of understanding and meaning to the work. It would be cool if I could incorporate a sense like that in my project, a recognition and re-realization of the old in the new.

Another artist (and epoet) who explores the idea of self-realization in this new media landscape is María Mencía. In her digital project Transient Self-Portait, an interactive work based on two important Spanish sonnets–one which references the passage of time and the other which invokes the idea of the unavoidable death, “the transient nature of the digital/data self” is explored. As the two sonnets appear and disintegrate across the screen, a self-portrait is constructed from the text. The two works become an illustration of the sonnets.

“the project is a response to some of the concepts that emerge from these sonnets: ephemerality of life, transient entities, fragility, which are also relevant to our age and the electronic world we inhabit. It questions the experience of reading; the use of digital grammars (interacting and engaging with the work); while exploring the concepts evoked in the sonnets.”

Participants are invited into the work, encouraged to use their own voices to control the direction of the piece and create a self-portrait from the text. User input is integral to the work. So, as you read the work and run your mouse over the text, you create in a very visceral way. “The creative process is that of producing, reflecting, programming and testing the medium to explore these notions in an electronic media society of dialogues with self-images, engaging the participant in a reading experience of ‘in’ and ‘out’ of language, via webcams and interactive aesthetics and poetics.”

I appreciate how, like Vavarella’s work, Mencia’s work realizes its conceptual under-layer. It articulates a point about the flesh and blood self through creative, digital interfacing. Also, it’s a recipricol exchange. I would love it if my own project could incorporate a level of reciprocity. I want my readers to feel not just like they got something from my work but that they also gave something back to it.

The New in the Old

In addition to looking at the work of digital artists and elit-creators, I also looked fro inspiration from work still being made more traditionally or in conjunction with traditional means. Amaranth Borsuk’s Moon Signs project, made in conjunction with artist Carrie Bodle, in once such combination work I found to be compelling and interesting. Borsuk’s project was inspired by Bodle’s wavesigns project (which is a sound and video installation where “a six-channel video installation layers five dimensions of oceanographic data on large semi-transparent textile screens, while a five-channel sonification engages viewers/listeners with references to underlying systems of data” which is really f*cking cool too) and consisted of two, participatory sound poetry events in which participants were invited to use “a lunar calendar as a poetic compass to navigate the night sky and build a word ladder to the orb that exerts such force over our lives and our language”.  Borsuk describes the project as thus:

“we designed a volvelle [a wheel chart] whose apertures reveal a word ladder composed of 31 words. The gradually changing poem waxes and wanes along with the lunar phases, shown on the opposing side of the dial. In the center of the volvelle, apertures reveal constellations of words from a cento printed below. This patchwork poem culls lines from dozens of poems that feature the moon: reflecting a range of time periods, styles, identities and themes. They range from poems responding directly to the lunar landing to poems in which the moon acts as lover or muse for the projective poetic imagination.”

This work, again, seems to reference the de-contextualization of text as a way for creating new meaning and story. I like that participants are invited to create and construct lexia in a collaborative way, too. Even if the work generated in seeming nonsense, there can be meaning in the act of participation itself.

moonsigns

Borsuk’s volvelle

Lisa Park‘s installations are also incredibly compelling and inspirational. Though differently from Elit, her art makes use of new digital technology to create new meaning and to explore the complexity of living in this day and age. One installation of hers I found particularly interesting was Rhythm. The project “is an interactive installation that translates the user’s heart beats into abstract visualization in real-time. A participatory work of time-based art, it allows participants to make rhythmic gestures of their heart beats. The detected heart beats modulate the thickness of each brush marks, which creates a recreation of one’s physical and emotional states.” Park states that the brush’s movements are inspired by Pollock and many of the color palettes are inspired by those of other famous works of trad art like Van Gogh’s Starry Night. Totally my jam. I love that integration of the new and the old. More, I really love art that references itself.

Park states, “The aim of this work is to create an enjoyable and playful experience for the visitors to create their own unique piece that captures their personality, emotion, and moments”. I like the idea of giving participants something that is uniquely their own, as well. Again, this kind if work, to me, makes use of reciprocity. You get what you give the work.

roxannekim

One of my faves~

You can foll @project_rhythm on Twitter to see some more cool works~

One last artist whose work I really enjoyed and that resonated with me was Judy Malloy and her work its name was Penelope. The installation is an interesting mix of elit and analog technology. Essentially, the work consists of a large, hypertextual painting and a computer, running Malloy’s book version of the text. Again, it’s another interesting juxtaposition of the old and the new, of what it means to create something by hand.  If I could, I would love to create a work that makes a, perhaps, hidden juxtaposition more accessible.

artists_books_penelope

its name was Penelope

Wrap Up

So…. I have a lot of ideas. A lot of inspiration. Not so much direction. I know I would like to create an installation that captures some of that neo-Dada I see in new digital media and that communicates what that means to participants or that invites participants to engage in their own kind of meaning-making. More, I would like to create a space for meaning-making to occur.

In my head, I’m envisioning this kind of immersive installation that surrounds the participants and their senses. But, maybe that’s not the best way to convey my purpose? Or, introduce my audience to my topic? I think I need to do more research on installation work but also on digital/elit artists and how they set-up their exhibitions. More, I think I need to get an idea of what would be possible to do with the resources I have at my disposal at my university.

So….yeah, I’m not really sure where that leaves me but I’m sure we can discuss it more at length on Thursday though~

****

*If you haven’t had enough of me already, you can check me out on the Twitter ^.^ Sometimes I’m witty???? #debatable?????

~Till next time~

hannibalwinkingsexilygif